|
News:Foreign enrolments to halve in four years: Marginson more International competitor fears overblown: Hawthorne more Schwartz paints picture of “moral zombiedom” amongst graduates more VET clusters will work better: VTA more HASS the “poor relation”: Macintyre more Technology solution comes online for Australian researchers more
Comment:
International:US targets foreign undergrads more US action usurps Australia-Indonesia ties more
Appointments:CASE appoints new Asia-Pacific executive director more CDU appoints leading economics authority as Professor of Governance more New role to increase number of Indigenous students more Ensuring the future viability of biometry more New director of Nura Gili Indigenous Programs more Swinburne appoints pro vice-chancellor (research) more Monash appoints dean of science more Lindsay Tanner inaugural vice-chancellor’s Fellow at Victoria University more
Health Sciences:Producing a competent workforce more
|
Indicating quality – or not?There is very little difference between old performance measures and the new ones, writes Marcia Devlin. Except in one very important area. And so, round two of the national "debate" about teaching quality is on. The federal government teaching indicators paper is out; senior executive across the country are pouring over it; discussion seminars on the proposed measures are in full swing (in Melbourne at least); blogs are alive with comment; institutional and other responses are being drafted and circulated. But what, exactly, are we debating? Round one involved the conception, gestation, birth and limited development of the Learning and Teaching Performance Fund (LTPF), announced in 2003, by the then Howard government minister...
|
|
|
Home | Contact Us | About Us | Advertise | Privacy | Terms & Conditions | Archive | Sitemap | Printer Friendly | Send to a Friend
© 2006-2010 APN Educational Media |